In the end, it's all corporate communications

One of the reasons I became disillusioned and left the mainstream media was that while it purports to be "independent" and "objective," it's really just corporate communications. That is, the media of today is largely owned by massive corporations who want to make money, and they do so by researching and reporting "news" and delivering it in an attractive enough package that people will buy/watch/listen to it.

Now that I'm older, wiser, and jaded, this seems like, duh, but back in my younger days, this really seemed like an issue to me. It was certainly evident that we journalists were largely steered to cover "acceptable" stories -- city hall scandals, urban violence -- while understanding that other stories -- such as corporate control of the country, for instance -- would not be career-building subjects.

So I left the media, did a half-dozen years of community service type work, then trended over to real corporate communications, figuring -- seriously -- that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Just so you know, I don't always sleep well with this deal with the devil, but mostly, I've found a way to make a living while doing relatively benign "corporate communications."

Today's sermonette is prompted by the item in the Times today about the Los Angeles Kings hockey team hiring "their own reporter" to write stories about the team on the Kings' web site. The story assures us that "reporter" is being given "complete autonomy to post reporting or commentary."

However, the story goes on to fret: "how sure can readers be of tough, impartial coverage when image-conscious businesses are paying for it?"

As if the Gray Lady herself, the Times, isn't image conscious.

First of all, this story isn't news -- Major League Baseball has had the same set up for its teams for several years. Secondly, it's a damn good idea in today's world. It's a world of instant publishing on a global communications platform. Why wouldn't you post your own fresh content?

And this brings us to "credibility." Every media outlet has a point of view -- you just have to figure it out and deal with it, whether you are a media consumer or a PR person. So this is just one more example of a type of media to deal with. Like I said, it's all just corporate communications.